Home > Identity, What I could do > Women Banding Together

Women Banding Together

Surfing_The_NetI was spending some time the other day poking around on the internet just seeing what new interesting things I could find.  Sometimes I can get lost for hours in doing this. It starts quite innocuously without any intent to let half a day go by virtually (no pun intended) unnoticed.  It’s much the same as what I do outside when the weather’s nice; I’ll head out the door, pick a neighbourhood, and just wander around for a few hours seeing what’s there.  So here’s my netmap.

As I frequently do, I began by Googling “women and retirement”.  As usual up popped things like Women and Retirement Savings, a site run by the United States Department of Labour.  Now please understand that I worked in government for years, and so I’m definitely not going to look to a government site for insight … much less clarity or perhaps even honesty.  And so I continued.

Next came the homepage for WISER Women, which initially looked hopeful as I read the first line of the banner which said “Women’s Institute for a Secure Retirement.”  Ah – but I’m learning the code and I know that as soon as a site starts talking about secure retirement they mean money.  I’m not surprised, then, when the second line of the banner – in smaller type – reads “Improving the long-term financial security of all women through education and advocacy.”  Statements like this really make me see red, in the sense that waving a red flag in front of a bull makes the bull crazy.  ”All” women?  Who are they kidding?  Not all women are going to be able to retire, not all women need only “get their ducks in a row“, wiserwebhomemain-ducks1as one of their articles states, to start on the path to secure retirement.  Already having my back up a bit, I then noticed an article with the title “Women and Retirement – ‘The Big Mistake’ “.  Here’s the teaser that was quoted for that article:  ”Poverty can visit any woman in midlife or old age simply because she ended up single. But if women only knew how to get their due from retirement or divorce, they may not have to face that hardship.”  Okay, having been pretty much financially devastated twice by divorce, I will attest to the fact that it might have been better for me economically to have known more about how to – as they put it – “get my due”.  That said, this is misogynistically suggesting, I think, that for a woman to have a secure retirement she’s got to have gathered money through a man.  Honestly I thought that kind of thinking was a thing of the past.   I couldn’t stop there,  however, so I followed the trail to the source for that article … to New America MEDIA.

That’s an interesting site, claiming to be the first and largest collaboration of ethnic news organizations.  The article was written by Cindy Hounsell, a 62 year old woman who has made it her life’s mission to educate women on the importance of financial independence and security. She arrived in Washington as a Fellow at Georgetown University Law School and today runs WISER. The nonprofit focuses on reversing the inequities that disadvantage women in later life.  Her article notes that research from Syracuse University shows that almost four in 10 divorced or separated women aged 65-plus and nearly one in three older widows are impoverished.  Okay – I apologize for my earlier response … they apparently are ‘getting it’.  I actually discovered, as I kept reading, that her message was very like one I was promoting a number of years ago when I worked on the film Math Counts, Science Matters for the Toronto School Board; a film – and teaching guide – which focused on the importance of young women not dropping out of Math, Science and Technology courses so that they kept more doors open for their own futures.  It was, and still is – and I guess will always be – about being independent which means maintaining some financial independence.

I went back to the list that was generated by my first Google search, and was almost through the second page of links before I came to a site that was about women and retirement and not about money. Women Redefining Retirement describes itself this way:

About

WHO AM I IF I AM NOT WORKING OR PARENTING?

Retirement is a common goal in our culture, and, usually, an eagerly awaited event. We are advised to plan carefully for, and, then embrace and enjoy our freedom and leisure.

There is a vast amount of information about our physical and financial health during the retirement years, but little about our emotional well-being during this major transition. We do our best to successfully reach this hard-earned time of life … THE GOLDEN YEARS.

Then, unexpectedly, some of us may find that, although there are many aspects of retirement that are rewarding and satisfying, there are also some surprising, disconcerting questions and feelings:

“How can I structure my day in a useful way?”
“How can I keep my creative juices flowing?”
“Why do I feel lonely and isolated?”
“Will too much togetherness stress my relationship?”
“Why do I feel sad when I should be happy?”
“What’s missing in my life?”
“Am I still of value?”
“How can I fill my time in a way that is satisfying?”

WHERE DO I START?

Women, specifically, need to:

  • Evaluate relationships and support networks
  • Identify personal goals
  • Consider, often for the first time, what their own needs are without first considering the needs of significant others
  • Identify interests that can provide a sense of fulfillment
  • Consider skills and talents which can be useful either in part-time or volunteer work

harlem1smallSeems that they’re asking a lot of the same questions that I’mmeet2 pursuing.  What they’ve done is formed a group, with lots of activities and social action and speakers.  They have meetings to learn new things and plan events, and it looks like they’re having a lot of fun too.  They started with 4 women and now have over 50 women attending every meeting.  I wonder if this is something I should think about starting here in Toronto?

So here I am at a bit of a crossroads.  I am busy working on the book so perhaps this is an idea – good as it is – that I need to keep on the back-burner for now.  That said, harnessing the energy of retired women to do good things sounds like such a great idea to me.

For now, I’m going to share the idea with you in case you want to consider starting such a group in  your neck-of-the-woods.  I’ll keep it in my “Ideas” file as well because along the way it just might be something I want to do.  Perhaps we could even include some Sacred Circle Dancing!

  1. Bettina Doyle
    February 1st, 2010 at 01:51 | #1

    Your net searches sound like mine. I still find it puzzling that there is little down to earth factual information for us regarding retirement and dealing with it other than financial. While that is important, finances is for most of us a set thing we have to deal with if we are getting ready to or have retired and all the other is up for grabs/not set and is such a lot to deal with yet no one deals with that. Or, if they do, it is in pat answers like “stay socially connected” but with no real ideas for doing that or addressing how hard that can be. Also if you believe most of the financial advice on how much money one needs to retire one would never retire. They seem to have it backwards anyway unless your rich because in reality you have to end up asking yourself how little money can I get by on if I want to retire and then work to adjust your retirement to the money. Not the money to the retirement. I think your “harnessing the energy of the retired” is a great idea. Just think how large the Boomer Generation is and how much energy is there and not being tapped for the most part. I thought of this during the political campaigning for the president last year and suggested using the retirees for the future on the internet for calls etc as we have more time but so far no take up on that. What a waste if not utilized. I will check out that site you mentioned. Have sort of been thinking in that direction lately at times.

    [Reply]

  2. February 1st, 2010 at 09:25 | #2

    A little off topic, but – “Now please understand that I worked in government for years, and so I’m definitely not going to look to a government site for insight … much less clarity or perhaps even honesty.” I’m disappointed, Slyvia – I would expected to see that comment on a right-wing website, and I know that’s not you.

    [Reply]

    Sylvia Bereskin Reply:

    Your comment really startled me, and I can see why you’d expect that sort of comment from the right-wing. So much of my time working in government, however, was putting a “spin” on things so that the public could understand it. That’s so far from just being open and honest. I think that’s why I got so many phone calls and emails from people … they knew what they’d get from me was a straight answer and if I had to say “I’m really not able right now to say more about this” instead of what was called “messaging” they respected that. I think that part of the problem is that politicians – and political parties – run on platforms which, once they’re elected, they start to adjust to the polls so that they’ll get re-elected. For example, Obama talked so much about health care for all and now he’s compromised so much that the plan that seems to be going forward is good for the insurance companies but not so much for the folks who need health coverage. I’d have more respect for him if he stuck to his principles around this and really put energy into what’s needed to convince the right that taking care of all citizens – not just some of them – is what the purpose of government should be. When I closed the door to my Ministry of Education office I made a promise to myself to never try to reduce a complex issue to four bullet-points again and to always point out “spin” when I see it … which, since I developed such expertise at spinning things is generally pretty apparent to me. All governments do this regardless of their party affiliations I think and it’s time that we – the citizens who elect our governments – start demanding more honesty, clarity and follow-through on promises made. Wow …. this is still clearly a burning issue for me because I’m finding it hard to stop writing now. Good thing I have to get going and pick up my son for lunch or this could be an endless reply. I hope this explanation has helped some.

    [Reply]

  3. Bettina Doyle
    February 2nd, 2010 at 23:05 | #3

    I know what you mean about having worked for the government. Best for me not to get started in on politics but I can’t seem to help it. I have been really disappointed with President Obama with regards to the health care issue this past year and increasingly angry with Congress. I am afraid I was one of the people who may have contributed to the democratic loss somewhat in Mass. recently as I decided not to help the campaign making calls to democrats in Mass. to get the vote out. At the time I did not feel the democrats in Congress or the President were standing up and fighting for what they said they were for and what most Americans want. They have to show me some action if they want my help. At the time I felt sad that it had come to this and like I had let them down but justified because they had let me and all the others like me down. I now have no regrets in making that decision because their loss in Mass. has it seems forced them to wake up and fight now. I am wary now though since it seems they only will do so if forced to by the people or some other entity rather than doing so because it’s the best thing for the people. Politics is a tiring mess right now in the U.S. I still have some hope and still like Obama but unless he and the Congress stand up and fights for what he said he would get done they won’t get my vote next time and I have let them know that. I still believe people can make a difference but it does require action and thought. I will shut up now! Just had to let off some steam.

    [Reply]

  1. No trackbacks yet.